|
|
|
 PRESS RELEASES IN THE BEGINNING OF MS. BRENNERS CAREER IN CRIMINAL LAW SHE HAS HAD SEVERAL VICTORIES AND GAINED EXPERIENCE IN NOT ONLY IN NEGOTIATIONS BUT IN LITIGATION. SHE HAS LITIGATED THE MOST SERIOUS CRIMINAL CASES FROM OVER 200 TRIALS, WHILE MOST FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS HAVE VERY LITTLE TRIAL EXPERIENCE. THIS ADVANTAGE MAKES NEGOTIATIONS EASY. Cherie Brenner was able to save this minor from a life term in state prison by negotiating the cases and getting numerous charges dismissed Daniel Rodrick was facing 25 to life for murder in the 1st degree. He served less than 7 actual years. THIS RELEASE SHOWS (SEE BELOW) MILTON PETTIS CASE WAS DISMISSED AFTER CHERIE BRENNER WITH HER INVESTIGATOR WERE ABLE TO PROVE THE WITNESSES HAD FABRICATED THEIR STORIES. NOT ONLY DID SHE DO THE POLICE WORK TO FIND THE RIGHT KILLER BUT ALSO HAD TO THEN CONVINCE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO DISMISS THE CASE. THE CASE WENT THROUGH TWO D.A.'S BECAUSE THE FIRST D.A. DIDN'T WANT A MURDER DISMISSAL ON HIS RECORD. SINCE THIS CASE MS. BRENNER WAS ABLE TO GET OTHER MURDER CASES DISMISSED.  WILLIAM HARRISON WAS LOOKING AT 150 YEARS TO LIFE DUE TO 3 DIFFERENT SERIOUS FELONY CASES. MR. BRENNER WENT TO TRIAL ON ALL 3 OF THESE SERIOUS FELONIES CASES WITH NUMEROUS FELONY COUNTS DUE TO HIS 3 STRIKE RECORD. SHE WAS ABLE TO HANG THE JURY AND GET ONE CASE DISMISSED AND AFTER THE OTHER 2 TRIALS WENT TO VERDICT, DEFENDANT DID A LOT LESS TIME THEN HE COULD HAVE. IN THIS CASE MS. BRENNER FILED A WRIT CONTESTING THE COURTS RULING DURING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING. THE WRIT WENT TO THE FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT WHICH RULED IN FAVOR OF BRENNER'S WRIT, OVERRULING THE LOWER COURT. DONALD MAGEE WAS FACING A LIFE TERM IN PRISON. MS. BRENNER GOT NOT GUILTY ON THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGES AND MAGEE WAS SENTENCED TO A FEW YEARS IN CUSTODY AND IS OUT OF JAIL.     MS. BRENNER WAS ABLE TO GET THE ORGINIAL BRANDISHING A FIREARM CHARGE DISMISSED AT THE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION. IN COUNT ONE, THE CHARGE WAS RAPE AND MS. BRENNER WAS ABLE TO IMPEACH THE VICTIM AT THE TRIAL IN THIS CASE AND SHOWED THE JURY THAT HER TESTIMONY WAS NOT CREDIBLE AND THE JURY AGREED BY THEIR VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY.  DUI,VEHICULAR,HOMICIDE,SEX CRIMES,THREE STRIKE LAW,DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DRUGS,DRUNK IN PUBLIC,UNDER THE INFLUENCE,VANDALISM,FIREARM,THEFT CRIMES,GRAND THEFT,PETTY THEFT,POSSESSION OF DRUGS,EXPUNGEMENT,APPEALS AND WRITS,SEALING RECORDS,DEFENSES TO CRIMINAL CHARGES,IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES,POST CONVICTION RELIEF,ADHD AND CRIME,WHITE COLLAR CRIMES,FIREARM OFFENSES,POSSESSION FOR SALES OF NARCOTICS,JUVENILE CRIMES,ASSAULT AND BATTERY,FRAUD,ROBBERY,BURGLARY,EMBEZZLEMENT,PROP.36,PROBATION AND PAROLE HEARINGS,LEWD CONDUCT,SOLICITATION,PROSTITUTION,UNLAWFUL CONDUCT WITH A MINOR,MOLESTATION,TERRORIST THREATS,RECKLESS DRIVING,SPEEDING,TRAFFIC CRIMES,HIT AND RUN,EXHIBITION OF SPEED,WET RECKLESS,DRIVING ON A SUSPENSE LICENSE,DMV SUSPENSION HEARINGS,SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY,COURTS,SUPERIOR COURT,ARRAIGNMENTS,JURY TRIALS,RIVERSIDE,TEMECULA,SAN DIEGO |
|
|
|
|
|
